Ah, I was not aware that I could add my own functions there. Maybe I will go through my various sites and put a collection of custom functions together. I have quite a few of them scattered around.
Thanks for information. 2009/12/23 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> > By the way you can implement functions for Array, Number, String or w/e you > want and release it as a plugin in the forge! :D (you should). > > http://mootools.net/forge/ > > > -- > Fábio Miranda Costa > Solucione Sistemas > Engenheiro de interfaces > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -core has the basics of what you need to build a web application. -more is >> stuff we want to release, but not stuff everyone is likely to use as often. >> yes, Array.unique is in -more, and YOU need it, but most people don't. We >> try to keep the -core as lean as possible. >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Trevor Orr <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> okay sound unique is already in more, guess I should be looking there >>> more, thanks. One question, why are there array functions in core and >>> more? For array why not just put them all in core? >>> >>> >>> >>> 2009/12/23 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> >>> >>> by the way: >>>> >>>> [].combine([1,2,2,3,4,4,4]) will return [1,2,3,4], and this function is >>>> still into mootools more: >>>> >>>> http://mootools.net/docs/more/Native/Array.Extras#Array:unique >>>> >>>> You guys should look more at mootools-more (got it, more..more, yeah you >>>> got it). >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fábio Miranda Costa >>>> Solucione Sistemas >>>> Engenheiro de interfaces >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Trevor Orr <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Cool, it now becomes. >>>>> >>>>> Array.prototype.unique = function() { >>>>> >>>>> var outArray = new Array(); >>>>> >>>>> this.each(function(val) { >>>>> outArray.include(val); >>>>> }); >>>>> >>>>> return outArray; >>>>> >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Sanford Whiteman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> > if (!outArray.contains(val)) { >>>>>> > outArray.push(val); >>>>>> > } >>>>>> >>>>>> You could use Array.include here. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Sandy >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
