Excellent stuff! Theres me thinking I was the only one using it commercially.
Still trying to get my head around how the CommonJS stuff works, on first look it seems to not want you to modify any of the Native objects which would be a pain, no .each() etc. available without some hoop jumping. We could end up lots of a lovely modules that all use different frameworks which could really be a bind and lead to bloat. That or we end up with a unified version (which I guess is what CommonJS is about but theres no mention of a spec as yet) which would seem sensible but a sticky problem to start as it will be a mind field of X does it like this, Y does it like that style wars. In our ASP code we've been using Response.Write's to push stuff to the response stream but after finding Jack and JSON Template I'm now thinking of creating a new code of our code that tries to emulate this somewhat with a final Response.Write at the end of the script. Also had an idea to create a XML Document for each page which could be loaded from a static (or multiple statics) and then you could do Element goodness with server-side before you write it down to the Response Stream, this would give client-side coders a leg up on how to do Server-Side as most of the DOM functions would be the same. Is that an insane idea? I'm still pondering it :) Believe it or not the XML manipulation stuff is pretty damn fast on ASP (MS got the guy who wrote the MS DOM stuff in for the re-write of their .net implementation as their initial version was massively slower than the old COM version). All the talk of ASP being slow tends to be based on old articles from 10 years ago. On modern machines in the real world its fantastically fast and really, really good fun to code with :) Pete On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:44 AM, ken <[email protected]> wrote: > Check raccoon. keetology.com is mootools powered. > > On Jan 7, 1:33 am, gabriel munteanu <[email protected]> wrote: > > i am using mootools with rhino on the server-side in a game. > > i am doing all the logic and hold all the data model in JS, both on > > the server and in the browser, and it is easy to maintain now. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, para <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > We are using it in APE Project (http://www.ape-project.org/). Our > > > webserver ships with spidermonkey and MooTools. > > > > > Btw, it's not CommonJS complient yet. (Hope for the next release ;)) > > > > > Anthony > > > > > On Jan 5, 8:58 pm, Offroadcode <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > > > >> Just putting some feelers out to see if anyone else is using Mootools > > >> server side? I've been playing with it in Classic ASP (which allows > > >> you to run JScript instead of VBScript). Its very fast and its lovely > > >> having the Moo goodness server side. I know some folk are using it > > >> with Rhino etc. would love to hear from others having some server side > > >> fun. > > > > >> Any views on CommonJS for Moo? Only found this the other day be very > > >> interested, still digesting it all at the minute though :) > > > > >> Cheers > > > > >> Pete > > > > -- > > jgabioshttp://bash.editia.info >
