I didn't mean to condescend... It looks like I didn't quite understand
the question. Sorry about that.
Does this (http://mootools.net/shell/Jwsxu/) answer the question, or am
I completely missing your intention here?
On 24/01/2010 9:01 PM, Roman Land wrote:
Hi Barry,
The basic and some of the advanced concepts are clear to me in JS,
this does not answer my question..
Thanks,
Roman
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Barry van Oudtshoorn
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hopefully this (http://mootools.net/shell/gs4QG/) will help to
explain it. :)
On 24/01/2010 7:58 PM, Roman Land wrote:
This is not what I need, I need a way to access the properties of
object who called this function, while when defining the function
also access inside of it two other objects..
var myobj = new Object();
mypbj.val1 = 'useful param';
mypbj.useParam = function(val1/* but not really*/){
//somehow get the val1 inside this function
var _val1 = val1;
this.process(_val1);
} // here I can use .bind / .pass - but they are not work since
they will override the instance variables of the calling object
otherobj = new Object();
otherobj.process = function(val){
console.log(val);
}
otherobj.callback = myobj.useParam;
Can this be done in JS somehow?
Thanks!
Roman
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:18 PM, ken <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
(function() {console.log(this)}.bind('Hello world'))(); //
this refers
to Hello world
(function() {console.log(this)}.pass('Hello world'))(); //
this refers
to window
(function(message) {console.log(message)}.pass('Hello
world'))(); //
this refers to window but logs Hello world
On Jan 24, 6:00 pm, Roman Land <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After reading the code I understand that .pass and .bind
are essentially the
> same, the difference being that with .pass the bind can be
null.
> Although the binding is null the original object closure is
still lost in
> the current context, example:http://mootools.net/shell/ck72p/
>
> I dont know if its possible but I am looking for a way to
pass an argument
> at function deceleration time and get it as part of the
"this" or as an
> argument, is there a way to achieve this?
>
> Thanks!
> Roman
>
> --
> ---
> "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
>
> - Albert Einstein
--
---
"Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
- Albert Einstein
--
---
"Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
- Albert Einstein
