haha, classic :) "this is not a bug! its a feature!" :) I am happy you find it useful, although if there's no documentation that says something of the sorts I wouldnt build my application around a possible bug..
What says moo dev team? On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:21 PM, אריה גלזר <[email protected]> wrote: > this might actually prove to be quite useful - i can see how this might let > you share variables between different instances of a class without using a > global object. this is sometimes a very desirable functionality! > ----------- > אריה גלזר > 052-5348-561 > 5561 > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 22:15, Roman Land <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I found out (the "bug" way ;) ) that if I write a class like so: >> >> MyClass = new Class({ >> >> myHash : new Hash() >> >> }) >> >> Later I will use this class >> >> a = new MyClass(); >> >> b = new MyClass(); >> >> I would seem that the hash is actually being shared :P >> My work around is to init the hash in the "initialize" method. >> >> Any thought about this? I dont like the aesthetics of this >> implementation... >> >> Cheers >> Roman >> >> -- >> --- >> "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." >> >> - Albert Einstein >> >> > -- --- "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
