Here's another look at "setEach".
http://gist.github.com/309165
http://mootools.net/shell/p99bD/5/
Main idea is that pass is augmented so that you can map how the
arguments to the curryed function should be. This could use a little
sugar, but it's clear right now what the intent of the idea is.
Keep in mind this solution is very flexible. No need for Element.set
to be used. Could do:
'#' + [10, 11, 12].map(Number.toString.pass(new Arguments({ 1:
16 }))).join(''); // #abc;
Olmo
On Feb 3, 11:18 am, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thomas, I like your setEach implementation. Not sure if it goes in -core
> either, but if it were there, I'd use it. If it weren't in core, I probably
> would use it a lot less, as you can always just express this more explicitly
> with -core methods, and it's probably not worth a plugin when I need to do
> stuff like this.
>
> That's probably your answer; it's neat, but the current way of doing this is
> not much more verbose or difficult.
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Thomas Aylott
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > No point in doing it yourself.
> > $$ aka Elements is already a custom Array of elements.
>
> > On Wednesday, February 3, 2010, Henrik Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I've been working on something similar.
> > > It's called Array.expose. Let's say that you have an array of
> > > elements:
>
> > > a = [el1, el2, el3, ... , eln]
>
> > > and then call the method expose:
>
> > > a.expose('set')
>
> > > then the method Array.set would actually be Array.each(function(x)
> > > {x.set()}).
> > > Therefore I can then do this:
>
> > > a.set('html', 'hello')
>
> > > Adding some way of using Array.map instead of Array.each might also be
> > > interesting
>
> > > On Feb 3, 10:04 am, Thomas Aylott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>http://mootools.net/shell/nrKCz/2/
>
> > >> Was talking to rpflo about this on IRC.
>
> > >> See #12
> >http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/jquery-1-4-released...
>
> > >> Just thought I'd share my final solution in case anyone thought it'd be
> > neat.
>
> > >> Personally, I don't think this sort of thing is really needed in
> > MooTools core.
> > >> But maybe I'll make it a plugin if anyone likes it.
>
> > >> — Thomas Aylott
> > >> SubtleGradient
> > >> MooTools
>
> > --
> > — Thomas Aylott
> > SubtleGradient
> > MooTools
