I think he just did it wrong. You have to send a mail to [email protected] with title(+content?) "unsubscribe" and not to regular mailinglist-adress.
Yann On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 23:32, Ryan Florence <[email protected]> wrote: > unsubscribe > > > No, I won't do it. > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Vince Byfield wrote: > > unsubscribe > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:31 PM, James Burke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> My name is James Burke, and I normally contribute to the Dojo Toolkit. >> However, I recently made a toolkit-agnostic loader, RequireJS: >> http://requirejs.org >> >> While it can be used without specific integration with MooTools, there >> are benefits with tighter integration, in particular making sure >> domready in MooTools waits for all scripts/modules to load. RequireJS >> uses dynamically created script src="" tags to load modules, which >> means they can finish after domready. >> >> RequireJS also has an optimization tool that can combine multiple >> modules into one. MooTools has a very nice web builder already. The >> RequireJS optimization tool is a great solution for projects with many >> files that build on top of MooTools Core/More. >> >> I believe the browser toolkits should try to use the same sort of >> script/module loader, one that works well in the browser. If not the >> same implementation then at least share the same loader format/API. >> Otherwise, I believe browser toolkits will get pressure over time to >> adopt the CommonJS module API, which does not work well natively in >> the browser. >> >> RequireJS compared to MooTools Depender: I believe they are similar in >> approach, but the dependencies for a module in RequireJS are specified >> within the module, there is not a separate file like scripts.json. >> RequireJS also tries to support some CommonJS idioms where it makes >> sense, and has a converter script that can convert a traditional >> CommonJS module into something that works well in the browser. So it >> will possible to reuse some CommonJS modules in the browser >> effectively. RequireJS does not have a server-backed loading option >> yet like Depender Server, but I am willing to get something like that >> to work. >> >> I have converted the Dojo codebase to use it via a conversion tool. I >> have done a fork of jQuery with unit tests that integrates RequireJS, >> but it is integrated as an optional component, the code can function >> without it. >> >> If you think this might be a useful module for integrating with >> MooTools, I am willing to do a fork of MooTools to integrate >> RequireJS, but I want to check with you all first to see if it might >> be a fit for your project. Also, I am open to changes in RequireJS, I >> do not consider the code frozen. >> >> Thank you, >> James >> > > >
