Just to be sure : it was that flaw that makes the "else" doesn't trigger ?
On 11 avr, 23:21, Simon Vart <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I was aware of that - ArrActif shouldn't be empy in the first > place, that's because we're adding pages that doesn't suppose to > exists. I was trying to adapt the script without too much bothering. > > But your answer makes me thinks of a much better idea. > > I won't adapt the script at all ! > > I will test the page displayed on and then serve the script in his > simpliest form :http://mootools.net/shell/yYpHz/ > > And if it's one of the added pages that shouldn't be here, I will > serve another script, without the ArrActif. > > Would you think it's a better design ? > > On 11 avr, 23:03, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I don't know if 'im doing a logical or syntaxic error in the script : > > > Both? > > > ArrActif can be an empty Array, but you call .get on its first element > > anyway. This throws a reference error that you should see in your > > console. You have to make sure to short-circuit before you call > > methods that don't exist. > > >http://mootools.net/shell/zEAam/4/ > > > (Changed as minimally as possible to work, I don't really think you > > have an optimal desigh here.) > > > -- Sandy -- To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
