In my opinion Code completion can be a dangerous thing. One if not paying attention could tab complete something way away from what they wanted in the first place but, close enuff to still fire and cause havoc. Two, it does not keep the API fresh in your head so things tend to slip away making for lazy/poor code. I have enough of that with out my editor helping me :D
If I had to use an IDE I would go with Netbeans but, in the end I prefer Notepad ++ with highlighting. Which if need be could support code completion. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Christoph Pojer <[email protected]>wrote: > Netbeans is quite good for JavaScript > > On Apr 13, 9:35 pm, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Does anyone still use aptana? > > > > I do. > > > > I'm not really convinced that there are that many people using a > > code-completing JS IDE. Seems so many people use text editors, with or > > without syntax highlighting, that all the IDEs are small minorities. > > (Just a collection of guesses, admittedly.) > > > > -- Sandy > > > -- > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. >
