Thanks Sanford,
OK i'am using your code:
complain.erase(element.get('id').toInt());
it looks much better and when it's faster :)

I agree to Oskar it's will be quite good to have more informations
about speeding up.

On 16 Apr., 22:55, "Matthew Hazlett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd appreciate seeing any performance data/findings you have to share, I
> often don't go to that level because most of the JS I do is for small
> projects where saving the user a few milliseconds is not going to increase
> efficiency in any meaningful way.  
>
> But I would definitely like to focus on this more then I have.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
>
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:20 PM
> To: Oskar Krawczyk
> Subject: Re: [Moo] Re: cant erase element why not?
>
> > Interesting.  Thanks  for  sharing this Sandy. I wish there was more
> > blog posts out there focusing on JS performance - I'm a bit shaky in
> > this specific area.
>
> Yeah,  often  the  performance  diffs  are negligible or take too many
> iterations  to  show  up, but it's something I'm always interested in.
>
> This  one  is  so  glaring that it's hard to ignore. Actually, even in
> Safari, unary+ blows away parseInt() (though all the numbers there are
> too-small-to-care).
>
> (Maybe I shall blog about this stuff... but everyone says that.)
>
> -- S.
>
> --
> Subscription 
> settings:http://groups.google.com/group/mootools-users/subscribe?hl=en- 
> Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -

Reply via email to