Awesome project kentaromiura! Thanks. -- Fábio Miranda Costa Solucione Sistemas Engenheiro de interfaces Twitter: fabiomiranda
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:12 AM, kentaromiura <[email protected]>wrote: > Well, there's a lot of thing to take into consideration. > for example, on chrome quite about every loop take 0ms with every > methods, see it yourself. > > IE have a + or - 15ms of accuracy, so you could use this: > http://iejst.codeplex.com/ > to test real javascript speed on ie... > > I *really* don't reccomend to do micro-optimization in general, and I > want to suggest you to don't use my fastest device :) > > > On Apr 22, 9:12 pm, Trevor Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is a very interesting page. So apparently this method is the fastest > > when do a lot of looping. At least on my machine. By looking at the > > function I would never have thought that possible but that is what that > > benchmark page shows. > > > > function kentaromiuraFastestDevice(iterations) { > > var testVal=iterations; > > if(parseInt(iterations/8)){ > > var n=iterations%8; > > do{ > > --testVal; //do stuff > > --testVal; //do stuff > > --testVal; //do stuff > > --testVal; //do stuff > > --testVal; //do stuff > > --testVal; //do stuff > > --testVal; //do stuff > > --testVal; //do stuff > > }while(testVal!=n);} > > > > while(testVal--){ > > //do stuff > > > > } > > } > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:59 AM, eskimoblood <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > WebReflection has a complete test page for all the different > > > approaches to loop over an array: > > >http://devpro.it/examples/loopsbench/ > > > > > But keep in mind: premature optimization is the root of all evil > > > > > -- > > > Subscription settings: > > >http://groups.google.com/group/mootools-users/subscribe?hl=en >
