On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Michal <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Sanford Whiteman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> You and Moo are both extending Natives. It's neither side's fault if >> there is a collision. But you can't really expect Moo to move rather >> than your in-house library. > > I'm not completely sure I agree on the case of undocumented functions: > it seems like having undocumented functions like this makes things > more difficult for developers. Would solutions be to: > > - Not use such uncodumented functions in MooTools (however, I'm not > sure of their purpose in this case, so I admit this might not be > possible/desirable due to other effects) > > - Document them to be used like other functions > > - Document them as "forbidden": they exist but might change in future > versions, so use at your own risk.
As pointed out earlier by Andre, this method is already documented. Regards Rajeev J Sebastian
