Thanks guys,

That's not what I'm looking for though. I have some big calls that
reload almost all the page (like Facebook, to say) and for these I
would like to give users "proper" loading feedback - as if the page
was loaded without AJAX. onRequest can just modify something within
HTML or temporarily change page title, but not change the state of the
browser.

Matt

On Jul 9, 8:14 am, Andrea Dessì <[email protected]> wrote:
> maybe using the same "onRequest" (or a global one) for all of them you
> can create a stack and show a loading box
> in the proper way :)
>
> --
> Andrea Dessì
>
> Email: [email protected]
> Skype: nkjoep
> Blog:http://www.stealthefish.com/
> LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreadessi
> Jabber: [email protected]
> Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/NKjoep
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 08:16, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > See also Spinner:
>
> >http://mootools.net/docs/more/Interface/Spinner
>
> > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Ryan Florence <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> onRequest: function(){ /* do whatever you want */ }
>
> >>http://jsfiddle.net/rpflorence/NF2jz/187/
>
> >> On Jul 8, 2010, at 7:07 PM, bootle wrote:
>
> >> > Hey,
>
> >> > I've been searching all around internet for a solution to make
> >> > browsers display loading information when accessing ajax content
> >> > (spinner on tab and/or in address bar, 'loading...' text as title etc.
> >> > - depending on browser). I'm looking for a behaviour like in Gmail and
> >> > Facebook (for some calls), best if it could be implemented for JSON
> >> > requests.
>
> >> > I found these two articles:
>
> >>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/04/27/loading-scripts-without-b...
> >> >http://www.obviously.com/tech_tips/slow_load_technique
>
> >> > Before I start experimenting with that though,
> >> > I'm wondering if you know what would be the best way to achieve it
> >> > with mootools? Is there any existing class/extension to Request that
> >> > could make this easy or an approach you would recommend?
>
> >> > Many thanks guys,
> >> > Matt

Reply via email to