++ On Aug 11, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Aaron Newton wrote:
> that solution isn't too elegant if this logic is inside a class. > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:26 AM, batman42ca <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks all. "this" is literally what I needed since as you've pointed > out, "this" is a reference to the element upon which I originally > added the event. I hadn't thought of that. > >
