Well, thank you for all of that. I don't think I have more questions ATM. :-)
On 17 août, 03:47, Thomas Aylott <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, actually. > > IE8 implements QSA, but its QSA doesn’t support lots of the selectors that > are pretty standard for all JS-based selector engines. > Some things in Slick are actually faster than in QSA alone. e.g. className > selectors in Slick use getElementsByClassName internally which is much faster > than QSA. > QSA is very strict, it will throw an error if there’s the slightest error > with your selector or you use something it doesn’t support. > Slick supports all kinds of awesome extensions. You can create your own > custom pseudoClasses and atrribute selectors. MooTools-Core uses that > extensibility a lot. > QSA in browsers actually contains a few bugs that Slick fixes. > > — Tom Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools — > > On Aug 16, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Savageman wrote: > > > > > Are those Selectors engine supposed to run "better" than > > querySelectorAll() which will be included in every browser? (except > > old versions of IE)
