Good work, having mooshell still around is only confusing to most. Maybe in time mootools.net/shell should just redirect or implement jsfiddle 1:1.
Instead of the 404 now you could maybe redirect to an information page telling people to contact you (or fill in a form) about a shell not being up anymore so it'll be changed to jsfiddle in 48 hours (I dunno, something). This way others that posted to /shell in some forum or whatever know what to do as well (instead of just getting the 404). Sometimes I think only a small percentage of moo-users (and potential / shell users) read this group. On Sep 26, 10:33 am, Piotr Zalewa <[email protected]> wrote: > I tried yesterday, but failed > is not as easy as resources here and there have different ids and names > I'll keep going > > On 09/24/10 18:37, Ryan Florence wrote: > > > > > > > I've been trying to close some tickets in lighthouse and have to just skip > > the ones with mooshell demos. > > > Piotr, should I just send you a bunch of slugs or what? > > > On Sep 24, 2010, at 10:30 AM, batman42ca wrote: > > >> Have the mooshell examples been moved to jsfiddle yet? I have a > >> mooshell example as part of a lighthouse bug report: > > >>http://mootools.net/jN7N7/ > > >> ... and now my example is no longer accessible. > > >> On Sep 21, 7:00 am, Piotr Zalewa <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> That's actually a very good idea > >>> it would have to remove the /shell/ from the url > >>> I'm asdding the mooshell examples to jsfiddle today/tomorrow > > >>> zalun > > -- > blog http://piotr.zalewa.info > jobs http://webdev.zalewa.info > twit http://twitter.com/zalun > face http://facebook.com/zaloon
