Firefox (firebug open, page freshly loaded)
Request with "evalScripts:true" result is ~233 while Request.JSON
~1800

Firefox (firebug closed, page freshly loaded)
Request with "evalScripts:true" result is ~230 while Request.JSON ~240

Google Chrome (page freshly loaded)
Request with "evalScripts:true" result is ~185-240 while Request.JSON
~185-240

any way to have firebug open and JSON fast loading ?


On Oct 13, 5:52 pm, Rolf -nl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Request JSON with firebug open: varies between 1300 & 3400 (actual
> fetching doc: 1.06-1.53 sec)
> Request with firebug open: 1172-2700 (actual fetching doc: 1.12-1.53
> sec)
>
> I clicked both like 20 times, but it's not the same all the time. One
> time it was really fast as well, so can't really say what the deal is.
> 1400 was perhaps an average?
>
> I guess it doesn't really matter what you choose, probably the server
> + connection + overhead + whatever is causing more delay than the
> method.
>
> On Oct 13, 3:58 pm, baikis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > well it seems that with firebug disabled it works faster.. wtf
>
> > On Oct 13, 4:51 pm, baikis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I have made a test casehttp://seklys.eu/up/test.html
>
> > > You can see the results in firebug console.
>
> > > On Oct 13, 3:46 pm, Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Shouldn't be VERY slower... it basicaly evals the response, just like 
> > > > when
> > > > you set evalScripts to true.
> > > > Can you elaborate?
> > > > Thanks for the feedback.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Fábio Miranda Costa
> > > > front...@globocore
> > > > *github:* fabiomcosta
> > > > *twitter:* @fabiomiranda
> > > > *ramal:* 6410
>
> > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Rolf -nl <[email protected]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > can you put up a test case jsfiddle?
> > > > > then we all can do some testing and report results...
>
> > > > > On Oct 13, 8:38 am, baikis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > hi,
>
> > > > > > can it be that mootools Request.JSON is much slower than simple
> > > > > > Request with "evalScripts:true"?

Reply via email to