> > @Aaron, thanks for the reply as always. Of course, you're right that > good client-side error catching should mean only clean data makes it > to the server, but I shudder at the thought of relying on client-side > validation only. See? I'm shuddering right now. Man, it's cold. > (-; >
I would never recommend that. It's not what I was suggesting previously; I'm just saying that in *theory* your server side validation (which should be there) should not be invoked.
