indeed.
On Oct 15, 8:45 am, Rolf -nl <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the ! in the PowerTools! name (tm). It gives that extra sugar > it needs. > > On Oct 15, 1:41 am, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I agree, that is a much better solution. > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Christoph Pojer > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > The elegant solution can be found in class-extras: > > >http://github.com/cpojer/mootools-class-extraswhichis part of > > > PowerTools! for MooTools:http://cpojer.net/PowerTools > > > > On Oct 14, 11:49 pm, mooyah <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I see... thank you for the reply at least. If I do stumble across > > > > something more elegant, I will let you know! > > > > > On Oct 14, 3:14 pm, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Binds is probably going to be deprecated at some point in the > > > relatively > > > > > near future in favor of a different solution to this problem. Instead > > > you > > > > > should probably just do something like: > > > > > > this._bound = { > > > > > foo: this.foo.bind(this) > > > > > > }; > > > > > > this.addEvent('foo', this._bound.foo); > > > > > > It's clunky, and it's what Binds was meant to fix, but ultimately > > > > > Binds > > > has > > > > > other issues, like the one you describe... > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:11 PM, mooyah <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I am having the exact problem as this post: > > > >http://www.mooforum.net/general12/binds-mutator-and-extended-classes-... > > > > > > > I have a deep OOD and each level has different methods which need to > > > > > > be bound to the class instance. Has anyone found a solution for this > > > > > > other than copying the Binds array from the extended classes down to > > > > > > the class that is being created directly?
