Yes you're right. Maybe just an extra link to the specs/selectors at w3 then perhaps ;)
But as you write "a lot of that", which implies there's more to discover. People can see it's powerful, but without more documentation (there's only 1 wiki for the reverse combinators) or examples I think only a "few" people will *really* use it, the current github readme is a bit intimidating, especially when you see the stuff under SelectorObject format, lol. *) "few" as in maybe 40% of the mootools users. On Oct 22, 11:19 pm, Sean McArthur <[email protected]> wrote: > A lot of that is just CSS selectors from the spec. > > > means immediate child, and works in all browser besides ie6 > > Sean McArthur > > On Oct 22, 2010 2:17 PM, "Rolf -nl" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think Slick should get a good section at /docs or an in-depth blog > post (series), because the readme at github is quite difficult to > grasp I think (in any case, If I show it to someone and ask them to > use it, they don't understand it). A whole bunch of examples would be > a good start with basic explanation of what things like > mean etc. > No? > > On Oct 22, 10:48 pm, Thomas Aylott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Vote herehttp://github.com/mootools/slick/issues/issue/7 > > > — Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera — > > > 2010/10/22 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]>: > > > > @Ryan > > > > This pseudo-class would be an awesome addition!
