It was documented in several places indirectly. For example, the docs for
Fx.Tween gave the example (something to the effect of):
el.get('tween', {defaults})
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Sean McArthur <[email protected]>wrote:
> I was unaware. I thought it might have been, so I checked the 1.2 docs, and
> it said nothing about passing a default value. So it must have been an
> undocumented feature?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No one in this thread seems to have said these magic words:
>>
>> this was a breaking change from MooTools 1.2 > 1.3.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:18 PM, André Fiedler <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> k, that´s bad. Used it a lot. ;o) Thanks so far
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/10/25 Sean McArthur <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> You don't pass a default. Thats not a behavior of MooTools (I know
>>>> Python dictionaries use the default value though).
>>>>
>>>> To get a default value, just use the OR (default) operator.
>>>>
>>>> var text = myEl.get('text') || defaultText;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:13 PM, André Fiedler <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So, if i now can get multiple values, how do i pass a default?
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/10/25 André Fiedler <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought the second parameter is the "default" if text isn´t set?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/10/25 Sean McArthur <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because you're calling Element.get with multiple arguments. If you do
>>>>>>> that, you'll get an object with key/value pairs, with each key being
>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>> the arguments you passed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:02 PM, André Fiedler <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why does this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://jsfiddle.net/SunboX/Qhsej/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> return an Object like that:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Object
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. : null
>>>>>>>> 2. text: "Go"
>>>>>>>> 3. __proto__: Object
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> using 1.3? It doesn´t using 1.2 instead?!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thx, André! :o)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
