@Olivier As i said it works fine for me, but i won't tell you that it will work 100% for every case. Take a look at what it supports and you'll be fine.
-- Fábio Miranda Costa front...@portalpadroes Globo.com *github:* fabiomcosta *twitter:* @fabiomiranda *ramal:* 6410 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Olivier El Mekki <[email protected]>wrote: > @Aaron > > For what I see, the simplest way to fully integrate mootools-runner in > hudson would be to add a junit output format to the runner. It would let > us use the xunit plugin, and it may helps for other CI tools. > > The other solution is to write an hudson plugin for mootools-runner, but > I don't know java personnaly and writing a hudson plugin seems not to be > a trivial task. > > > On 11:43 Thu 28 Oct , Aaron Newton wrote: > > It's on my todo list to do this for mootools itself. I'd be interested in > > collaborating a bit. I've been contributing to windmill a bit with plans > on > > hudston + windmill + our various test environments (there are a few). > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Olivier El Mekki <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was asked to write some mootools code for a project built in a > > > continuous integration process. > > > > > > Does anyone know if the new mootools' spec engine, mootools runner, > > > plays well with hudson? > > > > > > -- > > > Olivier El Mekki. > > > > > -- > Olivier El Mekki. >
