Yeah, I used to do it like this as well and it has worked well and is also very clear code. However the singleton class of cpojer is nice too and I've used it as well... check it out.
On Nov 2, 5:59 pm, Sean McArthur <[email protected]> wrote: > I was going to recommend the approach you just mentioned, OR... Not really > using a class at all. > > When having Singletons, I tend to just create an object literal. If you want > the singleton to be able to fire events, just extend Events. > > var Moobox = { > > }; > > Object.extend(Moobox, new Events); > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:56 AM, stratboy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi thank you all @Ryan and Arieh. > > > > Singletons > > > > There's Christoph's Class.Singleton, I've never used it though: > > > >http://github.com/cpojer/mootools-class-extras > > > If you think that I should use a singleton, then I'm going to use some > > natural js methods that are described here: > > >http://keetology.com/blog/2009/07/23/up-the-moo-herd-iii-its-classy-n... > > > In particular, I really like this one, using a closure: > > > (function(){ > > > // variable for holding the instance.. > > var instance = null; > > > this.Singleton = new Class({ > > > initialize: function(name){ > > if (instance) return instance; > > instance = this; > > } > > }); > > })(); > > > Bye! :)
