Well, merge does 2 things: override existing props, and eventually add
the new ones. I need only the override. So it's a 'subset' of the
merge functionality.

On 12 Nov, 11:35, Vito Tafuni <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think merge is not semantically correct!
> you are simply extracting from o2 using o1 like a template... where' the
> merge!?!
>
> At max I could expect from
> merge(o1,o2) -> { a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4, e:5 }
> merge(o2,o1) -> { a:1.2, b:2.2, c:3.2, d:4, e:5 }
>
> --
> -----------
> Tafuni Vito
> [email protected]
> ---------------------------------------------
> "Verba volant, scripta manent... data corrupted"
>
> 2010/11/12 stratboy <[email protected]>
>
> > Hi! Suppose this:
>
> > var o1 = { a:1, b:2, c:3 }
> > var o2 = { a:1.2, b:2.2, c:3.2, d:4, e:5 }
>
> > I want some kind of merge operation that merges only the props with
> > same key, so in the end I've got this:
>
> > var o3 =  { a:1.2, b:2.2, c:3.2 }
>
> > I know I can do it with a couple of passages, for ex. by using
> > Object.subset first. Though, I'd like to know i there's some other
> > smart way. It would quite handy if in the future releases of mootools
> > there will be a thing like:
>
> > Object.merge(o1,o2[,true]);
>
> > where the last option is for using only the common keys or not.
>
> > :) How about?

Reply via email to