@steve: you're out of scope @Tim, I'm quite sure that people out there don't read documentation too much. Milkbox has been out for some years and I've tons of support emails that tell me this fact. And I really do not have time to answer too much mails. I wanna do that options check mainly for myself.. :P But hey, again, you're code suggestion is quite interesting. options.A || options.B could do the job. I'll try, thank you.
On 20 Dic, 11:08, Tim Wienk <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess you could just document that options.B==true implies > options.A==true, and when checking for options.A, check (options.A || > options.B).
