Ahhh ok, got it.

If that's the case yes, then it shall be modified by the function as
well as return it :P

Hopefully this will be usefull for other MooTools pals

On 2 ene, 17:48, Arian Stolwijk <[email protected]> wrote:
> It returns the modified object, like Object.merge does, which could be
> useful if you use this function to return values in a function.
>
> var foo = function(){
>     var obj = {};
>     // blah, do something with the object
>     return Object.setToPath(obj, 'a.b.c', 100);
>
> };
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Ciul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Arian.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > WOW you got it reduced by...a ton of lines :P very nice :)
>
> > It seems still working the same :)
>
> > By the way, I don't return the modified object since the function
> > modifies it itself. I mean, the object passed is modified by the
> > function itself.
>
> > That might be changed now that I think it... LOL
>
> > On 2 ene, 17:36, Arian Stolwijk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I updated it a little:  http://jsfiddle.net/uqcDR/3/
>
> > > <http://jsfiddle.net/uqcDR/2/>
>
> > > Hope it still works fine, but that's why Tests/Specs were invented :)
>
> > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ciul <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hi pals.
>
> > > > I've seen myself in many circunstances needing something to append or
> > > > set values to an object in a given path got from a dynamic string.
> > > > I mean, each time receive a different string from some function and
> > > > then need to populate an object with values at the path given by that
> > > > string.
>
> > > > I wrote a function that could be added to MooTools->More->ObjectExtras
> > > > if MooTools developers think it worths it.
>
> > > > In fact I got kinda inspired from MooTools->More->ObjectExtras-
> > > > >getFromPath to write it. Thanks for that :P
>
> > > > jsFiddle link:
> > > >http://jsfiddle.net/Ciul/uqcDR/
>
> > > > Note: Look at the javascript console, it will throw some warnings but
> > > > you can see the results anyway.
>
> > > > Judge it by yourself and I'd appreaciate any feedback.
>
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Ciul.

Reply via email to