Pull request: https://github.com/mootools/mootools-core/pull/59
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jan Kassens <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > MooTools had the JSON object before it was specified. This is the > reason the method names are different and the implementation of the > browser isn't used if present. As Aaron said, I think someone added > the support but it must have been lost somewhere. > > This shouldn't be that big of a deal though, since the browsers that > have the JSON object all have quite fast JS engines and parsing a > typical JSON response should be a matter of a few millisecs. This > shouldn't be an excuse for not using the native functions, but you > probably wont have to worry about it (except if you want to send us a > pull request). > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Peter Hewat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > What is the reasoning behind not using the browsers native JSON if > > available? > > Regards >
