I wasted some time on a rebuttal, he probably won't approve the comment though.
On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:11 AM, hazlema wrote: > Its not my goal to downplay jQuery or say Mootools is better, they are > just different. But this artical why jQuery is better is just the > funniest thing I have ever read (or close to it). > > http://www.jquery4u.com/articles/jquery-mootools/ > > I really like reason #2. > jQuery is less confusing than Mootools! > It has less native extensions (including element) – jQuery has about a > dozen for Array, Object, and String and Mootools has about six dozen > for Array, Object, String, Function, and Number. > > While I can't argue the point of jQuery being easier to pickup, easier > does not mean better.. Is Visual Basic better then C++ because its > easier? However by giving you less functionality jQuery is somehow > better.
