Yeah, that's leftover from showing a colleague the same thing (but we were 
talking about the array prototype method "map" and how to add it to his 
array-like object).

Refresh the fiddle, I use typeOf instead.

On Mar 23, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Fli7e wrote:

> correct but why does typeof say "typeof map: function" .. i can't seem
> to find a functin in your code but an object ...
> 
> On 23 Mrz., 14:43, Ryan Florence <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It also creates arrays out of array-like objects (like arguments, what Slick 
>> returns, etc.)
>> 
>> http://jsfiddle.net/rpflorence/AU8WZ/
>> 
>> On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Steve Onnis wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Yes i read that. So basically all it does is [var] and creates an array of a
>>> single element with that element being the value of the argument
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Fli7e [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2011 10:52 PM
>>> To: MooTools Users
>>> Subject: [Moo] Re: erase from array not working
>> 
>>> It returns an Array if the Input is an Array ...
>> 
>>> from the Docs:
>> 
>>> Returns:
>>>    (array) If the variable passed in is an array, returns the array.
>>> Otherwise, returns an array with the only element being the variable
>>> passed in.
>> 
>>> On 23 Mrz., 12:41, "Steve Onnis" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Yeah figured that. I thought Array.from() would convert the string into an
>>> array...i was wrong J
>> 
>>>> From: Andrea Dessì [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2011 7:41 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Moo] erase from array not working
>> 
>>>> Hi Steve,
>> 
>>>> you are missing to split the value of the text input :)
>> 
>>>> have a look:http://jsfiddle.net/r8LSc/1/
>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Andrea
>> 
>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 05:42, Steve Onnis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Could someone have a quick look at this and maybe tell my why erase
>>> doesn’t work?  Include is working but not erase
>> 
>>>> http://jsfiddle.net/r8LSc/
>> 
>>>> Thanks
>> 
>>>> Steve

Reply via email to