If i can do it without it i would prefer not adding more weight to the code but thanks for thnfo
-----Original Message----- From: duclet [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 3:38 AM To: MooTools Users Subject: [Moo] Re: Common functions for events Why not just use event delegation? Add it in from More and you have it: http://jsfiddle.net/LWUX3/2/ On May 9, 11:41 am, "Steve Onnis" <[email protected]> wrote: > I did it like that cause i didnt think the event argument would get passed > in. Now i know :) thanks > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Izzy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:46 AM > To: MooTools Users > Subject: [Moo] Re: Common functions for events > > You're really basically there, except you're event handler is a bit > redundant. > > function submitFunction(ev) { > ev.stop(); > console.log(this) > } > > $("f1").addEvent("submit", function(ev) { > submitFunction.attempt(ev, $("f1")) > }); > > Why are you wrapping the submitFunction inside an anonymous function? > > By definition, the "this" inside that function will the the element it > fires on. > > Just do: > > $('f1').addEvent('submit', submitFunction); > > and call it a day ;) > > On May 9, 8:35 am, "Steve Onnis" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am wondering which is the best way to use a common function for element > > events. > > > For example, i have a form that loads on the page, then on that same page > i > > have an ajax window that opens that has other forms and i want to assign > the > > same submit event function for both forms. Because i need to add the > events > > to the forms in the ajax window programmatically i want to create a > generic > > function which i can assign to multiple forms. > > > Is this the best way to do it? > > >http://jsfiddle.net/LWUX3/ > > > Steve
