Would love to see this working even for 1.3 compatibility mode. Seems to be suffering in part to item number 1 here: http://blog.janjonas.net/2010-10-18/update-mootools-125-to-13-api-breaks-compatibility-layer
b On Apr 6, 6:16 am, Clement Hallet <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Rolf and Oskar. > > Indeed, moving to 1.3 is part of my plan. > I started to look at that a few weeks ago, but had some problems with > Implements and the BaseButton class. > After having learned more closely about 1.3, i'll redo it. And yes, feel free > to fork it, it would be nice to have some help :) > > By the way, another related question : what test suite do you recommend to > use with Mootools ? > > -- > Clément > > Le 6 avr. 2011 à 13:07, Oskar Krawczyk a écrit : > > > > > > > > > +1 to that. > > > On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Rolf -nl wrote: > > >> Didn't have to use a video player (html5 based) yet, but I want/will > >> try it out. > >> Please though make a moo 1.3 without compat version as well because I > >> try to avoid 1.2x especially when dealing with play/test stuff like a > >> html5 video thingy. > > >> If I have some free time over the weekend I will check it out and > >> maybe fork it to 1.3 etc. > > >> On Apr 5, 6:20 pm, Clément Hallet <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hello to the Mootools community, > > >>> I use that framework for years now, always been my favorite, and tried > >>> to be involved by writing a plugin last year. > >>> It's named Mooplay and is about providing controls to an HTML5 video > >>> element. > >>> It is published on the forge herehttp://mootools.net/forge/p/mooplay > > >>> It has been download a few thousand times, but I don't really know how > >>> simple the use is. If it has helped someone, or just lost them between > >>> the documentation and the code. > > >>> I would be happy to receive such comments from someone who has used > >>> it. If so, please let me know. > > >>> -- > >>> Clément
