Thank you Barry!
I'm learning some cool stuff with this thread =)

--
Fábio Miranda Costa
frontend@portalpadroes
Globo.com
*github:* fabiomcosta
*twitter:* @fabiomiranda
*ramal:* 6476



On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Barry van Oudtshoorn <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Perhaps it's worth noting that in IE10, XML islands are treated in the
> same way as Firefox/Chrome:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2011/07/06/html5-parsing-in-ie10.aspx
>
>
> On 07/07/11 05:16, Fábio M. Costa wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, it works with regular XML document (xml that you get from
> ajax).
>
>  Yes, please create a ticket on slick's github.
> If you wanna go further, fork slick on github, make the fix and send a pull
> request.
>
>  Thank you for the report!
>
>  https://github.com/mootools/slick
> https://github.com/mootools/slick/issues
>
> --
> Fábio Miranda Costa
> frontend@portalpadroes
> Globo.com
> *github:* fabiomcosta
> *twitter:* @fabiomiranda
> *ramal:* 6476
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Eric Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Fábio,
>>
>> I believe Sandy is spot on.
>>
>> I did indeed try Slick.search(document.getElementById('Config') ...;
>> IE 9 returns 0.
>>
>> I also tried an HTML 5 data block using the script tag, but Slick does
>> not parse the XML as part of a script tag:
>>
>> http://jsfiddle.net/HVSQZ/4/
>>
>> So, I can use Slick to parse XML contained in:
>>
>> - xml tag: broken in IE, since IE appears to return an XML node
>> instead of an HTMLUnknownElement
>> - random tag: cross browser, but would not pass HTML5 validation
>> - script tag (HTML 5 data block): broken in Chrome and IE (not tested
>> in FF)
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/scripting-1.html
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Using_XML_Data_Islands_in_Mozilla
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Would you recommend that I submit a ticket to modify Slick to work
>> with the HTML 5 data block, or is my use case inappropriate for Slick?
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback gentlemen,
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>> On Jul 6, 2:47 pm, Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>  > Think the problem here is that in IE, this is a "real" XML island with
>> > associated  proprietary  methods,  while  in  the  other browsers it's
>> > essentially an HTMLUnknownElement.
>> >
>> > -- Sandy
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Barry van Oudtshoornwww.barryvan.com.au
>
> Not sent from my Apple πPhone.
>
>

Reply via email to