But webservers are for geeks and js frameworks are (in many cases) also for designers. JQuery could probably have page like apache because it is most popular js framework, mootools have to CONVINCE people to use it - and best way is "to show, don't tell".
I know I started to use mootools because on mootools page I found animation I couldn't easily reproduce in JQ. And good design with clean message doesn't mean there could be no demos, does it? Thanks, On Sep 28, 8:24 am, Aaron Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > The most popular web server in the world:http://httpd.apache.org/ > > Sites about technology should focus on serving it to their audience. I miss > the old (first) MooTools.net, but on the flip side, the demos are better, > the docs are better, the library is better. If I had to choose, I'd choose > what we have... > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Same with me. (http://web.archive.org/web/20080513101403/http:// > >www.mootools.net/) > > In my opinion the main website should be showcase saying "this is why > > You WANT to use mootools!". > > That first black site with subtle animations did just that. > > > > Oh. I miss that design. > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:19 PM, batman42ca <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry to be critical but the initial design looks a little plain to > > > > me. It doesn't grab my attention. This: > > > > >http://web.archive.org/web/20070303200242/http://mootools.net/ > > > > > ... grabbed my attention. Especially the main menu. The main menu is a > > > > big part of what drew me to Mootools Back then, I hadn't seen anything > > > > like that before and I thought to myself, "I want my web sites to be > > > > able to do stuff like that" > > > > > So my suggestion is be eye-catching and rather than just links to > > > > demos, actually use Mootools on the web site.
