I guess since it took over a month for anyone to reply, you can see how the community is. MooTools is a great framework, but has not kept up with the latest JS. It should still work fine for what you want to do, but as you can see you'll probably get limited support. It's sad that MT didn't beat out jQuery because it was (is?) superior... IMO of course.
~Philip > On Aug 3, 2016, at 4:12 AM, chemiX <iamche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I realy like the MooTools JavaScript patterns. Since 0.8* and moo.fx I realy > like crete components for my sites with mootools classes, helpers and great > components. But now is 2016. ES6 knocking on the door. Babel.js, Webpack and > npm are new strong guns for building great javascripts websites, but... I > don't write SPA, I use JavaScript for better UX for my "classics" sites with > ajax requests. I don't need react.js and the huge platform behind it, like > redux etc... > > I want write Javascipt simple as posible ;-) and the mootools style I really > like. > > How you thinking about your codebase? Is there some ideas for next major > version of MooTools? Like remove mootools classes and start using ES6 and > create some helpers for better developer experience? > > > H. > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MooTools Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MooTools Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
