Helmut, go back to the bunker!  This is not about the politics.  I'll
pay anyone $59.95 for a legitimate one sheet for this film

Kirby


On Sep 30, 2004, at 12:31 PM, Helmut Hamm wrote:

Huuh, this is really a bit frightening.

HH

Where can I get the one sheet for FAITH IN THE WHITE HOUSE?  I'd love
to see the design for this poster!!!  Anyone got the 24 sheet?

K.



October 3, 2004
FRANK RICH
Now on DVD: The Passion of the Bush

You can run but you can't hide: Oct. 5 will bring the perfect storm in
this year's culture wars. It's on that strategically chosen date, four
Tuesdays before the election, that the DVD of "Fahrenheit 9/11" will
be
released along with not one but two new Michael Moore books. It's also
the release date of the equally self-effacing Ann Coulter's latest
rant, of a new DVD documentary, "Horns and Halos," that revisits the
Bush mystery year of 1972, and of an R.E.M. album, "Around the Sun,"
that gets in its own political licks at the state of the nation.

When Dick Cheney and John Edwards debate in Cleveland that night,
Bruce
Springsteen will be barnstorming in another swing state, as the Vote
for Change tour hits St. Paul. All that's needed to make the day
complete is a smackdown between Kinky Friedman and Teresa Heinz Kerry
on "Imus in the Morning."

Of the many cultural grenades being tossed that day, though, the one
must-see is "George W. Bush: Faith in the White House," a DVD that is
being specifically marketed in "head to head" partisan opposition to
"Fahrenheit 9/11." This documentary first surfaced at the Republican
convention in New York, where it was previewed in tandem with an
invitation-only, no-press-allowed "Family, Faith and Freedom Rally," a
Ralph Reed-Sam Brownback jamboree thrown by the Bush campaign for
Christian conservatives. Though you can buy the DVD for $14.95, its
makers told the right-wing news service WorldNetDaily.com that they
plan to distribute 300,000 copies to America's churches. And no
wonder.
This movie aspires to be "The Passion of the Bush," and it succeeds.

More than any other campaign artifact, it clarifies the hard-knuckles
rationale of the president's vote-for-me-or-face-Armageddon
re-election
message. It transforms the president that the Democrats deride as a
"fortunate son" of privilege into a prodigal son with the "moral
clarity of an old-fashioned biblical prophet." Its Bush is not merely
a
sincere man of faith but God's essential and irreplaceable warrior on
Earth. The stations of his cross are burnished into cinematic fable:
the misspent youth, the hard drinking (a thirst that came from "a
throat full of Texas dust"), the fateful 40th-birthday hangover in
Colorado Springs, the walk on the beach with Billy Graham. A towheaded
child actor bathed in the golden light of an off-camera halo re-enacts
the young George comforting his mom after the death of his sister;
it's
a parable anticipating the future president's miraculous ability to
comfort us all after 9/11. An older Bush impersonator is seen
rebuffing
a sexual come-on from a fellow Bush-Quayle campaign worker hovering by
a Xerox machine in 1988; it's an effort to imbue our born-again savior
with retroactive chastity. As for the actual president, he is shown
with a flag for a backdrop in a split-screen tableau with Jesus. The
message isn't subtle: they were separated at birth.

"Faith in the White House" purports to be the product of "independent
research," uncoordinated with the Bush-Cheney campaign. But many of
its
talking heads are official or unofficial administration associates or
sycophants. They include the evangelical leader and presidential
confidant Ted Haggard (who is also one of Mel Gibson's most fervent
P.R. men) and Deal Hudson, an adviser to the Bush-Cheney campaign
until
August, when he resigned following The National Catholic Reporter's
investigation of accusations that he sexually harassed an 18-year-old
Fordham student in the 1990's. As for the documentary's "research," a
film positioning itself as a scrupulously factual "alternative" to
"Fahrenheit 9/11" should not inflate Mr. Bush's early business
"success" with Arbusto Energy (an outright bust for most of its
investors) or the number of children he's had vaccinated in Iraq
("more
than 22 million," the movie claims, in a country whose total
population
is 25 million).

"Will George W. Bush be allowed to finish the battle against the
forces
of evil that threaten our very existence?" Such is the portentous
question posed at the film's conclusion by its narrator, the religious
broadcaster Janet Parshall, beloved by some for her ecumenical
generosity in inviting Jews for Jesus onto her radio show during the
High Holidays. Anyone who stands in the way of Mr. Bush completing his
godly battle, of course, is a heretic. Facts on the ground in Iraq
don't matter. Rational arguments mustered in presidential debates
don't
matter. Logic of any kind is a nonstarter. The president - who after
9/11 called the war on terrorism a "crusade," until protests forced
the
White House to backpedal - is divine. He may not hear "voices"
instructing him on policy, testifies Stephen Mansfield, the author of
one of the movie's source texts, "The Faith of George W. Bush," but he
does act on "promptings" from God. "I think we went into Iraq not so
much because there were weapons of mass destruction," Mr. Mansfield
has
explained elsewhere, "but because Bush had concluded that Saddam
Hussein was an evildoer" in the battle "between good and evil." So why
didn't we go into those other countries in the axis of evil, North
Korea or Iran? Never mind. To ask such questions is to be against God
and "with the terrorists."

The propagandists of "Faith in the White House" argue, as others have,
that the president's invocation of religion in the public sphere, from
his citation of Jesus as his favorite "political philosopher" to his
incessant invocation of the Almighty in talking about how everything
is
coming up roses in Iraq, is consistent with the civic spirituality
practiced by his antecedents, from the founding fathers to Bill
Clinton. It's not. Past presidents have rarely, if ever, claimed such
godlike infallibility. Mr. Bush never admits to making a mistake; even
his premature "Mission Accomplished" victory lap wasn't in error, as
he
recently told Bill O'Reilly. After all, if you believe "God wants me
to
be president" - a quote attributed to Mr. Bush by the Rev. Richard
Land
of the Southern Baptist Convention - it's a given that you are
incapable of making mistakes. Those who say you have are by definition
committing blasphemy. A God-appointed leader even has the power to
rewrite His texts. Jim Wallis, the liberal evangelical author, has
pointed out Mr. Bush's habit of rejiggering specific scriptural
citations so that, say, the light shining into the darkness is no
longer God's light but America's and, by inference, the president's
own.

It's not just Mr. Bush's self-deification that separates him from the
likes of Lincoln, however; it's his chosen fashion of Christianity.
The
president didn't revive the word "crusade" idly in the fall of 2001.
His view of faith as a Manichaean scheme of blacks and whites to be
acted out in a perpetual war against evil is synergistic with the
violent poetics of the best-selling "Left Behind" novels by Tim LaHaye
and Jerry Jenkins and Mel Gibson's cinematic bloodfest. The majority
of
Christian Americans may not agree with this apocalyptic worldview, but
there's a big market for it. A Newsweek poll shows that 17 percent of
Americans expect the world to end in their lifetime. To Karl Rove and
company, that 17 percent is otherwise known as "the base."

The pandering to that base has become familiar in countless
administration policies, starting with its antipathy to stem-cell
research, abortion, condoms for H.I.V. prevention and gay civil
rights.
But ever since Mr. Bush's genuflection to Bob Jones University
threatened to shoo away moderates in 2000, the Rove ruse is to try to
keep the most militant and sectarian tactics of the Bush religious
program under the radar. (Mr. Rove even tried to deny that the wooden
lectern at the Republican convention was a pulpit embedded with a
cross, as if a nation of eyewitnesses could all be mistaken.) The
re-election juggernaut has not only rounded up the membership rosters
of churches en masse but quietly mounted official Web sites like
kerrywrongforcatholics.com as well. (Evangelicals and Mormons have
their own Web variants on this same theme, but not the Jews, who are
apparently getting in Kerry just what they deserve.) Even the
contraband C-word is being revived out of sight of most of the press:
Marc Racicot, the Bush-Cheney campaign chairman, lobbed a direct-mail
fund-raising letter in March describing Mr. Bush as "leading a global
crusade against terrorism."

In this spring's classic "South Park" parody, "The Passion of the
Jew,"
in which Mr. Gibson's movie tosses the community into a religious war,
one of the kids concludes: "If you want to be Christian, that's cool,
but you should focus on what Jesus taught instead of how he got
killed.
Focusing on how he got killed is what people did in the Dark Ages, and
it ends up with really bad results." He has a point. It's far from
clear that Mr. Bush's eschatology and his religious vanity are leading
to good results now. The all-seeing president who could pronounce
Vladimir Putin saintly by looking into his "soul" is now refusing to
acknowledge that the reverse may be true. The general in charge of
tracking down Osama bin Laden, William G. Boykin, has earned cheers in
some quarters for giving speeches at churches proclaiming that Mr.
Bush
is "in the White House because God put him there" to lead the "army of
God" against "a guy named Satan." But all that preaching didn't get
his
day job done; he hasn't snared the guy named Osama he was supposed to
bring back "dead or alive."

"George W. Bush: Faith in the White House" must be seen because it
shows how someone like General Boykin can stay in his job even in
failure and why Mr. Bush feels divinely entitled to keep his job even
as we stand on the cusp of an abyss in Iraq. In this pious but not
humble worldview, faith, or at least a certain brand of it, counts
more
than competence, and a biblical mission, or at least a simplistic,
blunderbuss facsimile of one, counts more than the secular goal of
waging an effective, focused battle against an enemy as elusive and
cunning as terrorists. That no one in this documentary, including its
hero, acknowledges any constitutional boundaries between church and
state is hardly a surprise. To them, America is a "Christian nation,"
period, with no need even for the fig-leaf prefix of "Judeo-."

Far more startling is the inability of a president or his acolytes to
acknowledge any boundary that might separate Mr. Bush's flawed actions
battling "against the forces of evil" from the righteous dictates of
God. What that level of hubris might bring in a second term is left to
the imagination, and "Faith in the White House" gives the imagination
room to run riot about what a 21st-century crusade might look like in
the flesh. A documentary conceived as a rebuke to "Fahrenheit 9/11" is
nothing if not its unintentional and considerably more nightmarish
sequel.

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy |
Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

      Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


--
Galerie filmposter.net
Hackesche Hoefe, Hof VII
Rosenthaler Str. 40/41
10178 Berlin
Fon: +4930.308.24.953
Fax: +4930.308.24.954

http://www.filmposter.net
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

      Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to