OK, Bob, I dare you tell us the reasons why you think you were banned.

Dear David, et al...

You know a dare is my only weekness!  So, I'll save you the time of
composing a double-dog-dare...

I was actually banned from MPT for posting the exact same post I sent to
MOPO yesterday morning (I guess I can post it again below - you might also
want to check out Randy's recent MOPO posts for some background on the
recent upheaval at MPT).  As far as I can tell, my post didn't break (or
even come close to breaking) any of the rules of the forum - except for the
unwritten "thou shalt not disagree with Jon or Bruce" rule - and shouldn't
have been censored in the first place...  ;o)

You are right Koose, I also posted the following there this afternoon only
to have it deleted 6 hours later (before people were allowed to see it):

---------------------------
Dear Friends,

I have been asked not to post to the forum in the future.

Thank you for putting up with me for so long.

Cheers,
---------------------------

I'm fairly opinionated and outspoken, but WOW...

Good night all,

Bob

---------------------------
An open letter to the MPT Forum:


Congratulations on destroying the best forum in the movie poster world!

Strong words, but true nonetheless.

You all know my feelings on censorship.  And, if all my posts have to be
'approved' - then, I'm not going to be posting very much any more (I censor
myself enough already).  And, I know a lot of you feel the same (you'll
notice that a lot of the more senior/knowledgable members haven't posted in
the last couple days or have left the forum for good).  In fact, the reason
I never joined Style B was that I didn't like the idea that all members had
to be 'approved' to join.

And, the implication that this all comes about from libelous posts is pure
fabrication!  We were free to mention innumerable bad apples in the past.
It wasn't until recent events implicated the 'biggest apple' did all this
start.

If fear of litigation was really behind the recent censorship (and I know of
several posts that appear to have been censored - more than the single one
they officially concede) then the ABSOLUTE LAST thing Jon would have done
would have been to change to a completely moderated forum.  A forum owner
has virtually NO liability for what a member posts UNLESS it's a completely
moderated forum (the owner then becomes the publisher).  In fact, he did the
very worst thing he could have done from a liability standpoint!!!  THE VERY
WORST!  Think about it.  If you were afraid of being sued, would you do the
one thing that would open you up to MORE liability?  Of course not.  He
would have incorporated, so that there was no personal liability (and that
only costs a few hundred dollars to insulate yourself completely).

So, we can safely assume that the recent fiasco is a direct result of a very
small handful of dealers complaining to Jon, not from any threat of
litigation (that would certainly fail).  Or, more specifically, it probably
came from BH (judging by the timing and content of the recent posts and the
personalities involved)...

As we've said before, if you are a public figure, you open yourself up to
comment/criticism (go ahead, say whatever you want about me).  But, BH
obviously doesn't like that (remember his innumerable exits from MPT and
Mopo).  That's too bad!  Deal with it!  Jon needs to tell him (or whoever
else is complaining) to take a pill and leave him alone.  If you can't stand
the heat - get out of the kitchen.  You can be a big dealer OR you can be
anonymous, NOT BOTH.  Pick one.

No offence, but people who are trying to restrict a free and open discourse
on this site (there has not been even a single truly libelous post on this
site that I can remember) are no better than Fascists.  You are not in favor
of free speech, if you are only in favor of free speech for people who agree
with (or say only nice things about) you.  And, despite what you say, a
completely moderated forum IS NOT the same thing as what we had before -
it's a farce.  It's one of Bush's 'town hall' meetings - untrustworthy by
definition...

If we aren't free to comment on the bad dealers (as well as the good), then
we run the risk of becoming the internet version of one of Bruce's email
club messages (only without the giveaways) - nothing but bland praise and
useless discourse...  And, in this industry, being able to call out the bad
dealers is of utmost importance, as most of the wholesalers can't be trusted
to deliver 'original' posters when that is what is ordered...

Now, don't get me wrong.  I have absolutely nothing against Bruce or Jon.
In fact, I like both of them and would have absolutely no qualms about
dealing with either of them.  But, I tell my friends when they are wrong -
and in this case BOTH of them are wrong!  Dead wrong!   At times like these,
it is often easiest to curtail people's human rights (remember the Patriot
Act) than to do what's right.

You are putting your own needs and desires in front of several thousand
others, and that isn't right.  And, you are doubly wrong if the offending
posts happen to have a basis in truth...

Pease, please, please return MPT to what it once was - the best place on the
net to talk about what we all love.

Otherwise, prepare to become irrelevant...

Sincerely,

Bob Brooks









--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 27/04/2005

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

      Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to