This is a good idea. If I dealt in reproduction posters I'd certainly stamp them. As it is, we have a small bunch of repros (about a dozen or so of the Portal variety) that have been rolled up in a tube for years. Like you JR, I have a couple that were for posters I knew I'd never find (like THE MUMMY) and it has been sitting waiting to be framed for nearly 10 years. Seemed like a good $10 spent at the time. I have a WINGS OF DESIRE and APOCALYPSE NOW that were palmed to me in a deal a few years ago in a collection of real posters by some fly-through who came to Sydney from the US. These are rolled up in a tube marked FAKE POSTERS as an example to me that you can never be too careful with this material, no matter how long you been at it.
 
There are, however, some sellers out there that would give themselves some serious RSI were they to do this on their inventories of same-size repros and NEAR same size repros - like the "original" RAIDERS one sheet I got off a, ahem, reputable eBay seller who swore black and blue that it was original - and he's selling to a known dealer who's been around for 30 years. Of course when it arrived it was too wide, too short, too orange and was shiny both sides and had a moire you could throw a brick through. He refunded my money with an apology. That was one word: "sorry". What? Sorry he tried to rip me off for a hundred bucks, sorry he lied to me when I asked specific questions about its originality before bidding, sorry because he got caught out?
 
So yes, it is a good idea for reputable dealers to take up. But don't reputable dealers also clearly describe a repro for what it is before they sell it, or is the idea that eventually they will all get stamped and collectors in decades to come will know that that particular poster is a repro? There are millions of bogus one sheets out there including in the collecting food chain - lost of this stuff doesn't get bought and stay with that collector forever. eBay and the 'net has made every collector a "dealer", so this stuff is changing hands all the time, faster than it ever did before.
 
The guys selling the fakes, repros crap don't give a flying **** about originality or playing fair or being honest. They just want the money.
Phil Edwards
 
Phil Edwards Cinema Arts
26 Vista Avenue
Soldiers Point
NSW 2317
AUSTRALIA
 
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.cinemarts.com
Phone: (International Dial) 0011 61 2 49847322
Phone:  (Domestic Dial) 02 4984 7322
----- Original Message -----
From: JRS
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Reprints - Sellers should mark them

Dave has indicated to me that he thinks the concept of using a rubber stamp to identify same-size reproductions as such is a great idea and that he plans to implement it in his operation. It isn't often that a seller responds so positively to a buyer's public suggestion (which some sellers tend to immediately get defensive about for reasons I have never understood). Anyway, I think that's a strong recommendation for people on this list to make it a point to do business with ReelDeals.com and Dave's auctions (even if they aren't on MoviePosterBid.com...) -- whether you are looking for originals or reproductions (yes, folks, I do have some reproductions in my collection... I admit it... for those posters that I am never going to pay $50,000.00 or more for, not even if I win the lottery).
 
In the future, I will be continuing to stick my nose into other people's business and urging any and all sellers whom I see offering same-size reproductions that a rubber stamp saying "reproduction" be applied to all of them on the NSS line where it could not easily be trimmed off. It's such a simple concept, so easy to do, but it would be such a great help everyone. Imagine if we had all started doing this 10 or 15 years ago? There really is no reason not to do this and save ourselves and future movie poster collectors the worry.
 
"This has been a public service message from Poster Curmudgeons for A Better Tomorrow -- it's 6 o'clock in the evening -- have your posters come home for dinner yet?"
 
-- JR
  
----- Original Message -----
From: JRS
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Reprints - Sellers should mark them

Dave,
 
I have to agree with Danny on this one. One of the banes of movie poster collecting is the fact that in the past manufacturers of same-size reproductions of movie posters have often failed to put something at the bottom of the poster in the border that clearly states it is a reproduction. This really is inexcusable and in court would be considered an "attempt to commit fraud" if someone ever bothered to pay a lawyer to take it to court. In fact, when back when Sun was selling reproductions, they actually were taken to court and were ordered to put an identifying phrase on their merchandise.
 
While it is great that you identify reproductions in your on-line descriptions or catalog, what happens after you sell the reproduction? Do you care that the buyer can then pass it on as an "original" to some unwary purchaser in the future?
 
I urge all those who regularly sell reproductions to make up a small rubber stamp that says "reproduction" and stamp the identifying mark in the bottom corner, on the same line with any original information such as the NSS statement, so that it could not be cut off without significantly defacing the poster. It would only cost a few bucks to have the stamp made up. This would be the responsible thing to do -- and provide a great and lasting service to the move poster community from which you are making a living. It seems like the right thing to do, to me anyway. Is there a good reason not to do it?
 
-- JR
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 14:13
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Reprints

Hi Danny,

 Every one of my items is identified if it is a reprint or an original. As
far as an identification on the poster itself, some are clearly marked by
having the name of the reprint company right on the poster. Others aren't
marked as clearly. I personally do not add anything on or to the poster
distinguish it as a reprint.

 As in most cases, knowing your seller also helps in this department.

Hope this answers your questions and thanks for asking.

Sincerely,

Dave Smith
Reel Deals


----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Steward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 2:46 PM
Subject: [MOPO] Reprints


> This mail is directed to Dave Smith of Reel Deals and anyone else who is
> selling same size reproductions of movie posters.  Do you identify your
> reproductions in any way that they are indeed reproductions.  Is there any
> chop, mark, or ID on either front or back that your business has created
> these reproductions?
>
> Danny Steward / Seattle
>
>         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>   ___________________________________________________________________
>              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>
>       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>
>    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to