|
ITs not a excuse. People keep saying I am a dealer and so on
and so forth. I am not. Your right I could care less about customer service.I
have never hid that. And look at the advice Im getting after the fact. I have
had 7 diff versions of what the poster is from a magazine cut out to PORTAL to a
EARLY 80s REPRO to on and on. SO NO ONE KNOWS WHAT IT IS. AND that is WHAT
THE HELL I SAID. I listed in ORIGINAL as that is what I was told it was. I told
the history on it and SAID IT COULD BE A REPRO . HOW MANY DAMN TIMES DO I HAVE
TO SAY IT. If I had dealt with the MAKER of the poster then I would have said
so.If there was a NSS stamp on the back I WOULD have said so.
You said If it is a full-size reproduction it is a fake
- and certainly when you are listing
it in the originals section.
You know this for a fact.I dont. Are you telling me that there
has never been a FULL SIZED REPRODUCTION of this poster.Im sure there is.
As a matter of fact I know there has to be. And again I listed it in the
original section because I was sold the poster as original.So maybe what I
should have done is listed it in the reprint section and said that it MAY BE
ORIGINAL. Yea right!!!!
You said A little due dilligence on your part and
you could have easily determined this before listing and not
gone through all of this mess.
NO one has identified this poster YET. So it is not EASILY determined. And
if someone wants to do that MORE POWER TO THEM.Because while it is pretty well
proven that the poster is NOT ORIGINAL release no one has proven or spoken up to
what it is FOR SURE. And that is why I did not say it was ORIGINAL.That is why I
said that it was SOLD to me as ORIGINAL and that it COULD BE something
else.BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT I KNEW OF IT. If I had paid good money for the poster
YOUR DAMN RIGHT I would have found out FOR SURE what it was. But I did not. Do I
think the poster is ORIGINAL??? NO one has asked me??? So I will answer.
NO. But it could have been. I am not sure. But the poster was sold to me as
ORIGINAL. Did anyone ask me during the auction??? No. They could have and I
would have told them that I did not think it was ORIGINAL but that it could be.
But then MAYBE they read the description and ALREADY KNEW THIS. That they have a
BRAIN and can make up there own mind.
So what it boils down to is do I list it as a reprint and say it MAY BE
original that I am not sure or do I list it as a ORIGINAL and say that is was
sold to me as ORIGINAL and that it MAY NOT BE. You know what I did. and I would
do it again.Now that I think about it what I should have done is list it IN BOTH
SECTIONS. Too late for that.
Bottom line I could see you all jumping on me if I listed and sold the
poster as ORIGINAL with no disclaimer. Because then you would be right. But to
keep coming at me that I knew for sure or know better is WRONG plain and
simple.
Im done with this now.
Al
|
- Re: [MOPO] Creature from the black lagoon poster Al Shevy
- Re: [MOPO] Creature from the black lagoon p... Al Shevy
- Re: [MOPO] Creature from the black lago... Phil Edwards Cinema Arts
- Re: [MOPO] Creature from the black lagoon p... Richard Halegua Comic Art
- Re: [MOPO] Creature from the black lagoon p... Claude Litton
- Re: [MOPO] Creature from the black lago... John Waldman
- Re: [MOPO] Creature from the black lago... Al Shevy

