I agree that there is no only no excuse for not having a return policy -- in most cases it is against Federal laws about mail order to refuse to accept returns -- the law basically states that *any* seller who delivers his product through the U.S. Mails MUST accept returns within 30 days. But I think there is an exception to that: If the seller uses FEDEX or UPS or some other private shipping service rather than the U.S. Post Office then that law does not apply. Not sure, but I think that's the way it works. But even so, if the seller accepts PayPal, then they have a return policy whether they know it or not. If you file a buyer complaint within 30 days of making the PayPal payment, PayPal will arrange for you to get your money back -- they will even deduct it from the seller's bank account if the seller doesn't have any cash in his PayPal account balance. If the seller has totally flown the coup, there is nothing that PayPal can do, of course, but that rarely happens. Very few sellers -- even the crooked ones -- are willing to risk not being able to use PayPal again. By the way, don't let the 30 days expire with PayPal. Once you're past 30 days they will do nothing to help you.
 
I'm up against that now with a seller. It's been 3 weeks and the item has still not arrived. The seller seems honest and concerned, and even told me yesterday that he was mailing me another copy of what I bought, since the first one has not arrived. I hope at least one of them arrives by day 29 -- because on day 29 I'm filing a buyer complaint with PayPal no matter how nice and honest and sincere the guy seems. I'm simply not going to let my ability to recover my money with PayPal's help expire. If the item arrives shortly after I've filed the complaint, then I can withdraw it. But you should never let PayPal's 30 day time limit expire if you're having an issue with a seller.
 
Anyway, all of the legal aspects aside, any seller who does not offer a return/refund policy should be avoided. It could mean there is something wrong, or it could mean the seller is just not customer-friendly. Either way, you don't want to do business with them.
 
And there is no excuse for dark, muddy, out-of-focus, etc. pictures either. Not any more. Digital cameras are easy to use these days. Anyone who can't provide at least a decent photo of their item is also someone people should avoid doing business with.
 
People who want to sell to strangers on line and have those strangers trust them with their money -- whether they are casual sellers or full-time dealers -- they all need to meet the same minimum standard: Like having a return policy and a decent picture.
 
-- JR
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 17:49
Subject: Re: [MOPO] What to do?

federal law requires that mail order buyers must have a period within
which to return their purchases if they are not happy with them.
Now while most of us do indeed allow returns, most of us generally
allow 7-10 days to complete such a return.

the federal statute requires... get this folks... 30 days from day of
receipt within which a mail order buyer may be allowed to return
merchandise he/she is unhappy with. Considerably more time than
anyone I know wishes for a return ability on his customers behalf

Rich======================



At 02:26 PM 11/2/05, Walter Reuben wrote:
>hello all
>A seller by the name of
><http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=mmm3ms&item=7558027219&iid=7558027219&frm=1883&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:SID>mmm3ms
>has a considerable number of very interesting lobby cards for sale on ebay.
>One of them is a full lobby set for Double Indemnity:
><http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7558027219&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7558027219&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT
>
>I wrote to him and explained that the photos were very dim.  I went
>on to say that I am a very serious buyer and let him reference my
>ebay feedback.  I asked if his materials are returnable if they are
>not satisfactory.   Since the photos are of poor quality, I thought
>this was a reasonable thing to ask.
>He replied that no returns would be allowed since that "would not be
>fair to the other bidders."
>To me, this attitude is a major turn off.  If I am going to
>contemplate spending 2 or 3 thousand with a seller, I am very much
>concerned that he is going to be fair to me if I am unhappy for any
>reason at all.
>When I sell posters, either on my website or on ebay, I always allow
>returns within a week of receipt for any reason whatsoever.  I do
>not much like being told in advance by a seller that items are not
>returnable.  Especially since I very rarely need to make a return.
>What do you think?
>
>
>Walter Reuben<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
>"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
>
>Walter Reuben, Inc.
>
><?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns =
>"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />500 North Harper Avenue
>
>Los Angeles CA 90048  USA
>
>Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>(323) 651 3313
>
>www.walterfilm.com
>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>___________________________________________________________________
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to