|
Well, I loved
it. I am a huge fan
of the original. I always cried like a baby and told my friends it was a love
story, not a monster movie. They thought I was crazy. Peter Jackson’s
version pays such obvious and loving homage to the original that I appreciate
it even more. He truly must love the original and it shows in his film. I don’t
agree with the critics complaining that the first 30 minutes are too slow, but
I do believe the film would be better 30-45 minutes shorter. Just shortening
some of the action scenes a little an tightening the film overall would make it
“perfect”, IMHO. I think it would also increase the box office
because frankly, it is such an exhausting ride for 3 hours that I think it
hurting the multiple viewings. All in all, I
love it. DBT From: MoPo List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JR OK, after a year of waiting, I saw Peter Jackson's version of KING
KONG the other night... 3 hours never went by so fast. I have mixed reactions,
but it is *definitely* something that must be seen on the big screen with the
big surround-sound systems. I'll hold off on a full review for another week to
give y'all a chance to check it out. -- JR
|
- Re: [MOPO] KONG redux Tom Martin
- Re: [MOPO] KONG reviewed Wolfgang Jahn
- Re: [MOPO] KONG redux Toochis Morin
- Re: [MOPO] KONG redux Doug Taylor
- Re: [MOPO] KONG redux Dale Dilts
- Re: [MOPO] KONG redux Kirby McDaniel
- Re: [MOPO] KONG re Bucks JR
- Re: [MOPO] KONG re Bucks Richard Halegua Comic Art
- Re: [MOPO] KONG redux Saul H. Chapman, Ph.D
- Re: [MOPO] KONG redux Phil Edwards Cinema Arts

