|
Freeman:
Plainly put, if you liked the Christopher Reeve
Superman films you will probably like this new version....or is it
really new??
Director Brian Singer manages to emulate just
about everything from the Reeve films (--you'd swear it was shot on 1970s Kodak
Film stock--) including Luthor once again moving heaven and earth
(--especially earth --) to secure lucrative beachfront property, too much
Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth) and yet another reprise
of Superman carrying the lovely Ms. Lane on another moonlight glide
around the Big Apple...
It's not Superman Returns, it's
Superman Re-Hash.
Newcomer Brandon Routh is suitably stoic -- though
a bit young -- as Krypton's sole survivor and offers an effective
imitation of Reeve's bumbling, dorky Clark Kent. The physical resemblance
is downright eerie at times. If you were hoping for a Kent with
commanding presence -- ala George Reeves -- you'll be sorely disappointed.
Not that there aren't some nice touches.
Both Noel Neill and Jack Larson make cameo appearances, there's a nod to
the Superman pose on the cover of Action Comics #1, and director
Singer lifts lighting, shots and at least one scene from the
Fleischer Superman cartoons. The Christ
symbolism is also in full focus this time around
("I am sending you, my only, son to Earth") and Superman is referred to as a
"savior" on more than occasion.
Special effects have come along way since the
Reeves films and the flying sequences are eye-defying.
Still, the sense of wonderment so integral to
the character seems to have been left back on Krypton....
Earl Blair
CAPTAIN BIJOU
No stick here.....
|
- Re: [MOPO] SUPERMAN a bad remake? Flixspix
- Re: [MOPO] SUPERMAN a bad remake? Captain Bijou
- Re: [MOPO] SUPERMAN a bad remake? Why I love A... Kirby McDaniel
- Re: [MOPO] SUPERMAN a bad remake? Alan Heimann
- Re: [MOPO] SUPERMAN a bad remake? Saul H. Chapman, Ph.D

