Claude,
 
You are quite right that retaliatory feedback can hurt you if you plan to sell. This is why I have always recommended people have *two* eBay identities -- one for buying and one for selling. This allows your buyer identity to leave negative feedback when it is deserved and not have to worry about retaliation. A simple solution that works well -- and has the side benefit of not letting your potential customers see a person they buy from bidding against them for an item.
 
-- JR
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:16
Subject: Re: [MOPO] FEEDBACK SNIPING

You cannot snipe feedback.  As long as you know the item number the other person can retaliate after the 90 day mark.  Either give him a negative and expect one back or sit tight "as is" and forget about it.
 
I have found that giving negatives only hurt you.  Who cares if you give negatives except for your own satisfaction.  If you want to sell and you have less than 500 feedbacks, retaliatory feedbacks only lower your feedback percentage and it will stop some people from bidding for your items.  Ebay does nothing to help people who are willing to give negatives and they do not remove those who really deserve them.  Therefore I stopped years ago from giving negatives because had I done so for all the shoddy items I purchased I would have about a 90% rating which would do me no good when I want to sell something.
 
cjl
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to