|
I was just wondering how others employ terms
describing areas of paper loss on poster borders.
I generally use the term "nick" for anything under,
say, a quarter-inch at its widest end, usually triangular or V-shaped. I use the
term "paper loss" for anything larger than that and/or of a different shape
(half-moon or some such, most often).
I've never used the word "chip," though I've seen
many other vendors do so (auction houses in particular), and often for quite
large and significant areas of paper loss, like missing corners. "Chip" would
seem to imply a smaller, less significant area of paper loss to
me.
I'm wondering whether other sellers and collectors
have specific criteria for how they use or read these terms. Sorry if this seems
like a pedantic question, but any opinions would be welcome.
Thanks,
Dave
Posteropolis
|
- [MOPO] Nicks, chips and paper loss - A question. Dave Rosen
- Re: [MOPO] Nicks, chips and paper loss - A q... Phil Edwards Cinema Arts

