Re: [MOPO] TWO SHEETs to the wind

[JR]

There is no mention of "two-sheet" in the LAMP article on movie poster sizes, which is exhaustive. I personally never heard of or saw the term "two-sheet" used until Jon and some other people started tossing it around a few years ago. But  I don't have a problem with calling 40x60 card-stock Drive-In posters "two sheets" -- it's an appropriate name. I just don't think you'll ever find the term used in a studio pressbook to describe a 40x60 is all (now watch somebody prove me wrong...).   But we've got a nickname for every other poster size, so there's no reason the 40x60 shouldn't have one and two-sheet is appropriate, given that it is roughly twice the size of a one-sheet.   -- JR     ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom A. Pennock To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 18:29 Subject: Re: [MOPO] TWO SHEET Zeev:    I have this information out of Jon Warren's book listed under other sizes. If I am incorrect than this is incorrect information in Jon's "Movie Poster Price" I-Guide Book. In the book it states "Two Sheet or 40" x 60" American silkscreen process on heavy stock valued at 100% to 300% of the one sheet price. This is in the 5th edition.   I use the 45" x 59" subway interchangeably.   Best, Tom Pennock .  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.