Title: Re: [MOPO] Signatures On Posters Have Consistently Been A
First, let me say I know NOTHING about autographs and their value, so I have a pure collector's approach here.

Personally to me, it makes a huge difference WHO signed a poster and WHEN it was signed. I would value a vintage signature on a vintage poster much higher than a signature obtained at a celebrity show.
Actually, I would rather have an unsigned vintage poster than one with a contemporary signature.

My CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON onesheet is signed by Ben Chapman (one of the two guys in the creature suit).
I bought it signed and the autograph is in the bottom border, so it doesn't bother me, but frankly: I couldn't care less, and I don't think it makes any difference to the value of the poster.

On the other hand, the CREATURE onesheet pictured in Tony Nourmand's FILMPOSTERS OF THE 50s has been signed by Jack Arnold.
Now, to me, THAT would make a difference.

Not only was he a very important director, also, for all I know, he never added to his income by selling autographs at celebrity shows.

Come to think of it, I also have an INVADERS FROM MARS onesheet, signed by Arthur Franz. Not sure if this increases the poster value, but I honestly doubt it... At least I'm pretty sure it's original, after all, who would bother to fake an Arthur Franz?

Helmut Hamm

http://www.filmposter.net
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to