it is illogical to own a linen mounted poster that looks better in 2007 than it 
did in the theatre's fingerprint-stained glass showcase in 1944.
 
i have always been willing to pay more for unbacked items.  since bruce started 
this post, i will give him credit for selling tons of one sheets that were 
backed WITHOUT resoration.  i have one sheets from him that were backed, but no 
restoration so they are NOT offensive!!!!  last week bruce had all unrestored 
one sheets, of which they got premium prices because of that condition.  i was 
outbid!!!  the week before, some of his "restored" pieces seem to have sold 
low.  the trend is for unrestored.  most of bruce's consignors are probably 
from the old days, with those collectors backing everything.  bruce is one of 
the few that explain pre-restoration condition, but that seems to be demanded 
now.
 
of course, i have a few linen pieces, and sell them when i find their 
unrestored cousin.
 
want a perfect CASABLANCA?  buy the repro for ten dollars!!!
 
ALWAYS, UNRESTORED!!!  leave the damn stain, its okay, its character.  (missing 
pieces are offensive, but that defect is NEVER cured with added paper.)
 
.........and, linen isn't great either!!!!  how many people complain about 
their linen having crimps, wrinkles, becoming brittle, yellow, etc.  ....and 
then, some compalin if there isnt 2 inches of extra linen on each side.
 
ALWAYS..............UNRESTORED!!!!
 
michael
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from 
AOL at AOL.com.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to