Sue,
Based upon the still depicting a jungle scene, by process of elimination, we can scratch off Slightly Dangerous, Christmas in July, and Pittsburgh - not a jungle scene in the bunch. This leaves The Sea God (1930) with Fay Wray.
User Comments from IMDB for The Sea God (1930) has this review...
The Sea God is an early sound melodrama about two men vying for Fay Wray and wealth in the South Pacific. I bought this DVD in my unhealthy quest to see every Fay Wray film available, and I was pleasantly surprised that this was a fairly entertaining little film. Good locations, decent direction and photography (in spots), and a couple of twists made it well worth its short 75 minute running time. It's a bit creaky, and some of the acting doesn't hold up well, but overall not a bad effort. Fay looks great as the object of affection of the two men. There is even a scene where she is snatched from a boat by hostile dark skinned cannibals ala King Kong.
Sounds like a film that could have a diving suit, jungle scenes, arrows, and natives...
pj
Based upon the still depicting a jungle scene, by process of elimination, we can scratch off Slightly Dangerous, Christmas in July, and Pittsburgh - not a jungle scene in the bunch. This leaves The Sea God (1930) with Fay Wray.
User Comments from IMDB for The Sea God (1930) has this review...
The Sea God is an early sound melodrama about two men vying for Fay Wray and wealth in the South Pacific. I bought this DVD in my unhealthy quest to see every Fay Wray film available, and I was pleasantly surprised that this was a fairly entertaining little film. Good locations, decent direction and photography (in spots), and a couple of twists made it well worth its short 75 minute running time. It's a bit creaky, and some of the acting doesn't hold up well, but overall not a bad effort. Fay looks great as the object of affection of the two men. There is even a scene where she is snatched from a boat by hostile dark skinned cannibals ala King Kong.
Sounds like a film that could have a diving suit, jungle scenes, arrows, and natives...
pj
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [MOPO] NEED HELP IN IDENTIFYING A STILL
From: Susan <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, January 26, 2009 10:16 am
To: [email protected]
Hi ZeevThis is Sue from LearnAboutMoviePosters.com. According to our research for the U.S. Movie Studio Production Code book and our website, (we have gathered approximately 22,000 different production code numbers so far), the number "1271" was used by at least 3 major studios. Here is the information we have:MGM - 1943 - Slightly DangerousParamount - 1930 - Sea God (New York Series)Paramount - 1940 - Christmas in July (L Series)Universal - 1942 - PittsburghI hope one of these matches your still.Sue
From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of lobby card invasion
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] NEED HELP IN IDENTIFYING A STILLHi everybody,I need your help in identifying a still.It shows a jungle scene where a large number of natives are bowing to a man dressed in what looks like an old fashioned deep diving suit. The man in the suit may have an arrow stuck in his chest?The still has the number 1271-168Anybody knows the title of this movie?Is there already an available list cross referencing still numbers and movie titles?I vaguely remember Bruce H once purchased such a list, but I'm not sure it was ever published.Thank you,ZeevVisit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

