What the heck are you talking about? I never complain about how many times 
anyone plugs their auctions (and certainly not Bruce who I think only does it 
on closing day).
I simply used his posting from today as in indicator that he is alive and well, 
and hopefully reading MoPo.

My question for Bruce is a legitimate one - either he is aware of these 
"unknowing middlemen" taking no responsibility or he isn't.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Richard 
  To: Sean Linkenback 
  Cc: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:09 PM
  Subject: A question on a fake question?


  So, I guess if we were to look up "tenacious" in the dictionary we would see 
a picture of Sean?

  Just my personal observation here, but since Sean does so much of that I'm 
sure he won't object to me making one or two of my own:

  Sean always seems to be questioning Bruce's intent, integrity, or motivation. 
But what about his own? I for one find it strange that he never seems to turn 
his deft pen to chastise Grey about all the multiple plugs Heritage runs 
through this list every week... or those of Rixposterz... or Mom & Pop 
Culture... or Rich at MoviePosterBid.com... or any other of the other half 
dozen sellers who regularly post multiple messages each week advertising their 
listings.

  No, it only seems to be Bruce who is lucky enough to be beneficiary of Sean's 
rapier-like wit. So how come Bruce rates all the attention? If I were one of 
the other sellers I'd be miffed at never getting a mention -- they say even bad 
publicity is still publicity. Perhaps it's because Sean feels Bruce posts more 
often than anyone else? That may be true... I haven't done a statistical 
analysis. But then, Bruce does hold 3 *different* auctions each week -- far 
more than anyone else, so it would hardly be surprising (or somehow 'wrong') if 
he does post a few more FA announcements then the average bear.

  LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This opinion is purely personal in nature and offered "as 
is" with no warranty expressed or implied. No compensation has been rendered to 
the author by emovieposter.com or any other retailer. Reading of this opinion 
in no way obligates the author to make restitution for any loss of damages that 
may result from someone reading this opinion. Oops... I guess I should have put 
that part at the beginning of this message... so sue me.

  -- JR

  Sean Linkenback wrote: 
    I wasn't sure if Bruce was away this holiday weekend, and perhaps missed 
this inquiry, but seeing him plug his auctions again this morning, I thought I 
would ask this again:

Bruce wrote in his latest email club message:" It seems that some of those who 
unknowingly sold some of these as middlemen 
are taking the odd position that they have no liability in this, and that they 
want the people they unknowingly cheated to join them in lawsuits against those 
they obtained the fakes from, and that they won't be refunding those they 
unknowingly cheated." 

Do you have any actual firsthand knowledge of this happening? Or is this just 
something you made up for the club?I know that I would like to keep from 
spending money with anyone who was taking this stance and certainly would like 
to be made aware of them, but perhaps it is all speculation on your part and 
thereis nothing to worry about?

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to