Interesting in these troubling times of highly vocal and public flying fur tantamount to an unproduced George A. Romero script that suddenly propriety catches like the swine flu and everybody goes private and off the meter.
I would be the last to add fuel to the tiresome individual obsessions of some toward frequent targets on here and the other groups, but for the record, my answer is this: the most slammed individuals on this list are likely the ones with the confidence to stand through it all and remain that way long after their 15 minutes as obsessi-targets has waned. Posts like Michael Greenwood and Greg Douglass' recent ones about their love of the apparently increasingly hot exploitation posters are few, far between and as welcome as an oasis these days. And to Michael, the original poster, I'm not excluding you because you do still often share your love of collecting and various pieces that you own and seek. It'd be great to see more of that like the old days. The recent reported hobby crisis seems to have caused a run on age old vendetta renewals, high horse riding, asinine personal attacks and the general excuse to throw down before the bell even rings. It just seems nice to know a lot of days here recently that someone, anyone still has a passion for something anymore besides baiting and bitching. Always makes one warm and fuzzy when crises bring a family close, don't it. Fred --- On Thu, 9/17/09, Michael B <[email protected]> wrote: From: Michael B <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [MOPO] GETTING SLAMMED To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 11:22 PM the 5 or 6 private emails that i got so far were hysterical. but what is said in private, stays private. mbb -----Original Message----- From: Phil Edwards <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, Sep 17, 2009 11:43 pm Subject: Re: [MOPO] GETTING SLAMMED I think we have enough agent provocateurs without having a poll about it to further inflame the situation. Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul J Angel To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [MOPO] GETTING SLAMMED Sorry, but are you serious? Do we need this on MoPo now, or ever? I'm just asking... pj On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Michael B <[email protected]> wrote: WHO GETS SLAMMED THE MOST ON MOPO ??? ( keep it brief..... we'll know the reason just by the name ( if this turns interesting, we can turn it around and talk about the people most praised............. michael Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
