RE:

Manna from heaven for Andy Neal, cue inevitable, sanctimonious response. 

Care to expand on that Richard?




Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:30:59 +0000
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT:   just a heads up
To: [email protected]

Hi Scott,
Yes, I noticed all that.
My issue was him making a drama here about something taking place at another 
forum at the expense of that forum.He alerted one of the moderators of that 
forum and posted here before having received a response, whatever he actually 
thought that response would be.All of which he was good enough to inform us of:
"I have contacted the moderator, due to the fact that on many forums this is an 
egregious breach of etiquette and my guess would be that the moderator would 
not want this type of element on their forum.  I am waiting to hear back, but 
whatever the outcome, it's really no skin off my apple."
Manna from heaven for Andy Neal, cue inevitable, sanctimonious response. It's 
not MPF (of which incidentally, I believe Bill is a member), therefore it's 
obviously the other one.Followed by further knocking of NSFGE here.
That was my issue, not whether or not he had a shadow, I'd seen the posts on 
NSFGE.I don't agree with your view that his shadow's subsequent posting on here 
was a validation of Bill's initial post.And, there's no reason to assume his 
shadow would have posted here if it hadn't been raised.Bruce's similar NSFGE 
shadow "Douche" didn't, distinct possibility it's the same person, though I 
don't know.
I believe at some point Bruce stated he had help from a profiler with his 
"Douche" (no really, though I'm not absolutely sure he was being serious) and 
Rich H is also on the trail, so no doubt the culprit will be brought to 
book.While it's tiresome, juvenile and hardly the actions of a well balanced 
happy chappy, I may well be in the minority by thinking it is actually less 
serious than the classier crimes of Joe Hernendez, or the Rochester boys for 
that matter.(Admittedly though, I've not been on the receiving end of it, Rich 
H and Bruce may understandably take a less relaxed view if they've been 
libeled.)
It is and was, deserving of less fuss, and not least because that's exactly 
what the person doing it wants.
Nothing against you Scott, you provide a fine service, but I'm not inclined to 
comply with your request, so I'd rather you take me off the list.It's been on 
my mind to leave MoPo since the tiresome fallout of the fake business anyway, 
so this is a welcome decider.
That guy may have been right about me liking to stir the pot, something about 
this place, I'm better suited to where the gruel is less dense.
Cheers,Richard



On 1 Nov 2009, at 04:23, Scott Burns wrote:  Richard,   I'm really surprised at 
your attitude here. Upon investigation, I've discovered that Bill Scutta really 
does have a serious concern. Just over an hour after he made his "heads up" 
post, a forged post appeared on MoPo bearing his name. His alert about someone 
using his identity was a valid one.   I think you were very quick to judge. 
Scutta has already left the group...and I don't blame him a bit. I think you 
owe him and MoPo an apology.   Scott MoPo List Owner  
       From: MoPo List   [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Richard   Evans
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 1:29 PM
To:   [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT: just a heads   up

    We're not talking about identity theft to apply for credit cards etc in   
the victim's name.  Just a juvenile amoeba getting his kicks winding up the 
thin skinned on   poster message boards.  Just like Bruce and his shadow 
Douche, who supposedly forced his dramatic   exit from NSFGE.  Besides, since 
this kicked off as soon Bill Scutta joined NSFGE, i don't   think it unfair to 
assume this is a continuation of history from elsewhere,   perhaps even that 
most sanctimonious of poster forums. 

Sent from   my iPhone  
On Oct 31, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Henry Mazel <[email protected]>   wrote:

        +1 on that. I've had two identity thefts, one really big     on, and 
the head's up is extremely helpful.

Henry

www.ThePosterMint.com

In     a message dated 10/31/09 12:42:32 PM, [email protected]     writes:


    have to disagree with YOU, Richard.
As a victim of       identity theft I want to know anything of the kind. The 
fact that someone       has used someone else's name (another MOPO'er or 
otherwise) to sign up on       another site is a big heads up for me and I 
thank Bill for the       post.
 
Joe B in NOLA



    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com    
___________________________________________________________________    How to 
UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List        Send a message addressed to: 
[email protected]    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF 
MOPO-L        The author of this message is solely responsible for its     
content.  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com  
___________________________________________________________________  How to 
UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List    Send a message addressed to: 
[email protected]  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF 
MOPO-L    The author of this message is solely responsible for its   content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

                                          
         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to