Rick,

Nah, that does not fly as any kind of excuse or rationale. Look, this seller has over 6,000 positive Ebay feedbacks! Surely after all that they now have an intimate understanding of the rigors of shipping and know what to do to prevent damage to valuable items handed over to the Post Office. This is seller negligence and amounts to the item being "not as described" since they were described as near-mint and that is NOT how people are receiving them. And this result is clearly not the fault of the Post Office, but the fault of the seller who knew better and apparently didn't give a damn.

-- JR

[email protected] wrote:
Just wanted to say that the Help! one sheets I received were exactly as described. I think the total problem was in the method of shipment--that the tubes were not as sturdy as they should have been. This is not an example of any deception whatsoever in terms of the condition of the posters BEFORE they were shipped. I bought 4 of them in all and because I only live a few miles away from the dealer, the tube arrived in perfect condition. But obviously it was not a sturdy enough tube and in some instances couldn't withstand being sent a longer distance. There was no hidden agenda here on the seller's part in terms of the condition of the Help! one sheets PRIOR to being shipped.
                                                             Rick
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to